Question:
Yeah, i’ve been following this with interest … :-) i’ve been taking prozac for 6 yrs now < Gronk !!! > M.S. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >x-no-archive: yes > Web Page at: http://www.robertpo.com >Prozac is losing its patent protection, and it is starting to drum up >support for the New! Improved! Gets Clothes Whiter! Prozac by casting >aspersions on the original formulation.
Response:
>Yes I saw it Robert, and…..you can chat live with the >author of "Prozac Backlash" at abc20/20 website after > the show, but, Im not sure of the exact url, sorry. >I almost posted this too.
I had those very same symptoms that the subjects described, the suicidal ideation the thoughts of cutting, God it’s horrible to consider that it was a damn side effect. My pdoc thought I was prone to suggestions too, hope she watched that! Web Page at:www.robertpo.com
Response:
Good post, Mark. But you really should give credit to McMan’s Newsletter wherefrom the material was derived (plagiarized???). — Deep – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> x-no-archive: yes > > Web Page at: http://www.robertpo.com > Prozac is losing its patent protection, and it is starting to drum up > support for the New! Improved! Gets Clothes Whiter! Prozac by casting > aspersions on the original formulation > Nihil, > Here are the facts behind tonight’s show. > Mark > PROZAC MANIA – PART II > Paradox: If you do the right thing and make your current product safer, > does this amount to an express admission that your original product was > found wanting? Could you be held liable? Could your behavior even be > construed as fraudulent? > This is the problem Eli Lilly, makers of Prozac (fluoxetine), may be facing. > The company is preparing to launch a new version of its blockbuster > antidepressant next year, under a license agreement with Boston-area > Sepracor, just as its 14-year patent is due to expire. The original Prozac, > according to Eli Lilly, carries a number of risks. In the words of the > manufacturer: > "Fluoxetine produces a state of inner restlessness (akathisia), which is one > of its more significant side effects … It is also known that in some > patients, use of fluoxetine is associated with severe anxiety leading to > intense violent suicidal thoughts and self mutilation …. In other patients > manic behavior follows treatment with fluoxetine." > All this is spelled out in Eli Lilly’s patent for its new version of the > drug. According to the patent, the new Prozac will eliminate the side > effects of the old drug. The drug maker filed for the patent in 1995 and it > was granted in January 1998. For whatever reasons, Eli Lilly did not > broadcast the news. > A year later, the company was taken to court by a family who refused to > settle (see Newsletter2#18). Bill Forsyth, a retiree living in Hawaii, had > been prescribed Prozac for his anxiety and depression, and was admitted to a > psychiatric hospital, where doctors continued giving him the drug. Eleven > days later, he returned home and stabbed his wife of 37 years, then impaled > himself on a kitchen knife. > Despite the disclosure in court of documents showing that Eli Lilly had been > fully aware of Prozac’s side effects since the 1970s and 1980s and had been > active in the suppression of certain information, the jury decided that the > drug was not responsible for Bill Forsyth’s acts of violence. Then again, > the jury knew nothing about Eli Lilly’s new patent. According to the > Forsyth’s lawyer, Eli Lilly never revealed its license agreement to the > plaintiffs or the court. So last week the Forsyths filed a federal lawsuit > accusing the drug maker of fraud. > Dr David Healy of the North Wales Department of Psychological Medicine at > the University of Wales, who testified as an expert witness at the Forsyth > trial, estimates that "probably 50,000 people have committed suicide on > Prozac since its launch, over and above the number who would have done so if > left untreated." > But an Eli Lilly spokesman maintains: "There is no credible evidence that > establishes a causal link between Prozac and violent or suicidal behavior. > There is, to the contrary, scientific evidence showing that Prozac and > medicines like it actually protect against such behaviors." > No doubt, the company will have ample opportunity to defend that claim in > court. > For two media articles, please see:
http://www.spokane.net/news-story-body.asp?Date=060900&ID=s813090&cat=">clic > k here</a> > <a
href="http://www.spokane.net/news-story-body.asp?Date=060900&ID=s813090&cat= – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> .
Response:
I am very very very very sorry. I slam stuff together and cut off the edges for neatness. Im not trying to imply that my team of scientists and reporters compiled all that. If I was, I would be bragging for weeks. It wasnt plagiarism in my mind, cause I wasnt trying to pass it off as new and origional work and deliberately not giving the author credit. I rushed and left some stuff on the bottom, but cut it off too early. Sorry. I guess I should be sure to give reference sources in the future. I will drink a glass of mustard and puke on my new shoes tonight for punishment. Anyone interested in subscribing to this fine newsletter which contains a variety of interesting bipolar related issues can do so by following the link below. It is called "McMann’s depression and bipolar weekly." The author is John McManamy. He does this solely for the purpose of helping others and it is free. It seems very up to date. And, I heard he is very handsome and a sharp dresser and can really dance. If you are not a subscriber, please sign up here: <http://www.suite101.com/splash.cfm/depression> <a href="http://www.suite101.com/splash.cfm/depression">click here</a>
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Good post, Mark. But you really should give credit to McMan’s Newsletter > wherefrom the material was derived (plagiarized???). > — > Deep > > x-no-archive: yes > > > Web Page at: http://www.robertpo.com > > Prozac is losing its patent protection, and it is starting to drum up > > support for the New! Improved! Gets Clothes Whiter! Prozac by casting > > aspersions on the original formulation > Nihil, > Here are the facts behind tonight’s show. > Mark > PROZAC MANIA – PART II > Paradox: If you do the right thing and make your current product safer, > does this amount to an express admission that your original product was > found wanting? Could you be held liable? Could your behavior even be > construed as fraudulent? > This is the problem Eli Lilly, makers of Prozac (fluoxetine), may be > facing. > The company is preparing to launch a new version of its blockbuster > antidepressant next year, under a license agreement with Boston-area > Sepracor, just as its 14-year patent is due to expire. The original > Prozac, > according to Eli Lilly, carries a number of risks. In the words of the > manufacturer: > "Fluoxetine produces a state of inner restlessness (akathisia), which is > one > of its more significant side effects … It is also known that in some > patients, use of fluoxetine is associated with severe anxiety leading to > intense violent suicidal thoughts and self mutilation …. In other > patients > manic behavior follows treatment with fluoxetine." > All this is spelled out in Eli Lilly’s patent for its new version of the > drug. According to the patent, the new Prozac will eliminate the side > effects of the old drug. The drug maker filed for the patent in 1995 and > it > was granted in January 1998. For whatever reasons, Eli Lilly did not > broadcast the news. > A year later, the company was taken to court by a family who refused to > settle (see Newsletter2#18). Bill Forsyth, a retiree living in Hawaii, > had > been prescribed Prozac for his anxiety and depression, and was admitted to > a > psychiatric hospital, where doctors continued giving him the drug. Eleven > days later, he returned home and stabbed his wife of 37 years, then > impaled > himself on a kitchen knife. > Despite the disclosure in court of documents showing that Eli Lilly had > been > fully aware of Prozac’s side effects since the 1970s and 1980s and had > been > active in the suppression of certain information, the jury decided that > the > drug was not responsible for Bill Forsyth’s acts of violence. Then again, > the jury knew nothing about Eli Lilly’s new patent. According to the > Forsyth’s lawyer, Eli Lilly never revealed its license agreement to the > plaintiffs or the court. So last week the Forsyths filed a federal > lawsuit > accusing the drug maker of fraud. > Dr David Healy of the North Wales Department of Psychological Medicine at > the University of Wales, who testified as an expert witness at the Forsyth > trial, estimates that "probably 50,000 people have committed suicide on > Prozac since its launch, over and above the number who would have done so > if > left untreated." > But an Eli Lilly spokesman maintains: "There is no credible evidence that > establishes a causal link between Prozac and violent or suicidal behavior. > There is, to the contrary, scientific evidence showing that Prozac and > medicines like it actually protect against such behaviors." > No doubt, the company will have ample opportunity to defend that claim in > court. > For two media articles, please see:
http://www.spokane.net/news-story-body.asp?Date=060900&ID=s813090&cat=">clic > k here</a> > <a
href="http://www.spokane.net/news-story-body.asp?Date=060900&ID=s813090&cat= – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> .
Response:
Here’s the exact text from McMan’s Newsletter. — Deep > –This is the message header– > McMAN’S DEPRESSION AND BIPOLAR WEEKLY (June 14, 2000 Vol 2 No 21) > PROZAC MANIA – PART II > Paradox: If you do the right thing and make your current product safer,
does this amount to an express admission that your original product was found wanting? Could you be held liable? Could your behavior even be construed as fraudulent? > This is the problem Eli Lilly, makers of Prozac (fluoxetine), may be
facing. The company is preparing to launch a new version of its blockbuster antidepressant next year, under a license agreement with Boston-area Sepracor, just as its 14-year patent is due to expire. The original Prozac, according to Eli Lilly, carries a number of risks. In the words of the manufacturer: > "Fluoxetine produces a state of inner restlessness (akathisia), which is
one of its more significant side effects … It is also known that in some patients, use of fluoxetine is associated with severe anxiety leading to intense violent suicidal thoughts and self mutilation …. In other patients manic behavior follows treatment with fluoxetine." > All this is spelled out in Eli Lilly’s patent for its new version of the
drug. According to the patent, the new Prozac will eliminate the side effects of the old drug. The drug maker filed for the patent in 1995 and it was granted in January 1998. For whatever reasons, Eli Lilly did not broadcast the news. > A year later, the company was taken to court by a family who refused to
settle (see Newsletter2#18). Bill Forsyth, a retiree living in Hawaii, had been prescribed Prozac for his anxiety and depression, and was admitted to a psychiatric hospital, where doctors continued giving him the drug. Eleven days later, he returned home and stabbed his wife of 37 years, then impaled himself on a kitchen knife. > Despite the disclosure in court of documents showing that Eli Lilly had
been fully aware of Prozac’s side effects since the 1970s and 1980s and had been active in the suppression of certain information, the jury decided that the drug was not responsible for Bill Forsyth’s acts of violence. Then again, the jury knew nothing about Eli Lilly’s new patent. According to the Forsyth’s lawyer, Eli Lilly never revealed its license agreement to the plaintiffs or the court. So last week the Forsyths filed a federal lawsuit accusing the drug maker of fraud. > Dr David Healy of the North Wales Department of Psychological Medicine at
the University of Wales, who testified as an expert witness at the Forsyth trial, estimates that "probably 50,000 people have committed suicide on Prozac since its launch, over and above the number who would have done so if left untreated." > But an Eli Lilly spokesman maintains: "There is no credible evidence that
establishes a causal link between Prozac and violent or suicidal behavior. There is, to the contrary, scientific evidence showing that Prozac and medicines like it actually protect against such behaviors." > No doubt, the company will have ample opportunity to defend that claim in court. > For two media articles, please see:
http://www.spokane.net/news-story-body.asp?Date=060900&ID=s813090&cat=">clic k here</a> > <a
href="http://www.spokane.net/news-story-body.asp?Date=060900&ID=s813090&cat= > http://www.spokane.net/news-story-body.asp?Date=061100&ID=s813751&cat= > <a
href="http://www.spokane.net/news-story-body.asp?Date=061100&ID=s813751&cat= ">click here</a> > For Eli Lilly’s new patent, go to: > http://164.195.100.11/netahtml/srchnum.htm > <a href="http://164.195.100.11/netahtml/srchnum.htm">click here</a> > .. and enter "5,708,035" in the search field..
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> x-no-archive: yes > Good post, Mark. But you really should give credit to McMan’s Newsletter > wherefrom the material was derived (plagiarized???). > — > Deep > That is categorically NOT where_I_read the article. I believe that I > read the article while doing a search with > http://www.themedengine.com > …
Response:
You’re forgiven, if, for no other reason the literary beauty of your reply
) As to the low down on Prozac……. YES. This is exactly the point I have been trying to make for some time now in the face of what I perceived as defensiveness or even ridicule. — Deep – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> The interesting thing is that for some people, Prozac is a very > effective medicine with no side effects. But as the program > and research has show, it can be devastating, leading to suicide > in quite a few instances, as well as tardive dyskinesia…destroying > control of the motor nerves. There are instances of homicidal > violence, and it appears that Eli Lilly knew of this and covered > it up. > mark > x-no-archive: yes > > Good post, Mark. But you really should give credit to McMan’s Newsletter > > wherefrom the material was derived (plagiarized???). > > — > > Deep > That is categorically NOT where_I_read the article. I believe that I > read the article while doing a search with > http://www.themedengine.com > …
Response:
The interesting thing is that for some people, Prozac is a very effective medicine with no side effects. But as the program and research has show, it can be devastating, leading to suicide in quite a few instances, as well as tardive dyskinesia…destroying control of the motor nerves. There are instances of homicidal violence, and it appears that Eli Lilly knew of this and covered it up. mark
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> x-no-archive: yes > Good post, Mark. But you really should give credit to McMan’s Newsletter > wherefrom the material was derived (plagiarized???). > — > Deep > That is categorically NOT where_I_read the article. I believe that I > read the article while doing a search with > http://www.themedengine.com > …
Response:
Web Page at: http://www.robertpo.com
Response:
> Web Page at: http://www.robertpo.com
Yes I saw it Robert, and…..you can chat live with the author of "Prozac Backlash" at abc20/20 website after the show, but, Im not sure of the exact url, sorry. I almost posted this too.
Response:
> x-no-archive: yes > Web Page at: http://www.robertpo.com > Prozac is losing its patent protection, and it is starting to drum up > support for the New! Improved! Gets Clothes Whiter! Prozac by casting > aspersions on the original formulation
Nihil, Here are the facts behind tonight’s show. Mark PROZAC MANIA – PART II Paradox: If you do the right thing and make your current product safer, does this amount to an express admission that your original product was found wanting? Could you be held liable? Could your behavior even be construed as fraudulent? This is the problem Eli Lilly, makers of Prozac (fluoxetine), may be facing. The company is preparing to launch a new version of its blockbuster antidepressant next year, under a license agreement with Boston-area Sepracor, just as its 14-year patent is due to expire. The original Prozac, according to Eli Lilly, carries a number of risks. In the words of the manufacturer: "Fluoxetine produces a state of inner restlessness (akathisia), which is one of its more significant side effects … It is also known that in some patients, use of fluoxetine is associated with severe anxiety leading to intense violent suicidal thoughts and self mutilation …. In other patients manic behavior follows treatment with fluoxetine." All this is spelled out in Eli Lilly’s patent for its new version of the drug. According to the patent, the new Prozac will eliminate the side effects of the old drug. The drug maker filed for the patent in 1995 and it was granted in January 1998. For whatever reasons, Eli Lilly did not broadcast the news. A year later, the company was taken to court by a family who refused to settle (see Newsletter2#18). Bill Forsyth, a retiree living in Hawaii, had been prescribed Prozac for his anxiety and depression, and was admitted to a psychiatric hospital, where doctors continued giving him the drug. Eleven days later, he returned home and stabbed his wife of 37 years, then impaled himself on a kitchen knife. Despite the disclosure in court of documents showing that Eli Lilly had been fully aware of Prozac’s side effects since the 1970s and 1980s and had been active in the suppression of certain information, the jury decided that the drug was not responsible for Bill Forsyth’s acts of violence. Then again, the jury knew nothing about Eli Lilly’s new patent. According to the Forsyth’s lawyer, Eli Lilly never revealed its license agreement to the plaintiffs or the court. So last week the Forsyths filed a federal lawsuit accusing the drug maker of fraud. Dr David Healy of the North Wales Department of Psychological Medicine at the University of Wales, who testified as an expert witness at the Forsyth trial, estimates that "probably 50,000 people have committed suicide on Prozac since its launch, over and above the number who would have done so if left untreated." But an Eli Lilly spokesman maintains: "There is no credible evidence that establishes a causal link between Prozac and violent or suicidal behavior. There is, to the contrary, scientific evidence showing that Prozac and medicines like it actually protect against such behaviors." No doubt, the company will have ample opportunity to defend that claim in court. For two media articles, please see: http://www.spokane.net/news-story-body.asp?Date=060900&ID=s813090&cat=">clic k here</a> <a href="http://www.spokane.net/news-story-body.asp?Date=060900&ID=s813090&cat= .
Response: