Question:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > > >Correct me if I’m wrong, but I know that benzodiazepines work by > > suppressing > > > >the CNS. So why are they addictive? And first of all, what is the > > definition > > > >of addiction? Effexor and Paxil has terrible withdrawal symptoms; why >are > > > >they not considered addictive, for example?? > > > There are two kind, psychological and physical. Which do you mean? > > both > I agree with all the above about benzos. However, antidepressants are > not addictive. > Basically, addictive psychiatric drugs (i.e. benzodiazepines) are all > like alcohol and all the other well known addictive drugs. The exact > reason they are addictive, on a molecular/biochemical level, is a > mystery. >OK. I drop my request for a molecular/biological level description of >addiction. All I ask is, why do you call alcohol and benzos addictive, and >the AD’s not addictive! What is the behavioural difference between the >addicts to benzos and patients strugling to withdraw Effexor? >cem
I suppose you could start with saying you can’t take xanax for a year and NOT have withdrawal, but can stop Paxil abruptly and be just fine. It doesn’t fit.
Response:
>I suppose you could start with saying you can’t take xanax for a year >and NOT have withdrawal, but can stop Paxil abruptly and be just fine. >It doesn’t fit.
But people have sued the manufacturers of Paxil and won because they didn’t reveal the severity of withdrawal. There have been scores of Paxil anecdotes here, some people have no problem while others say it was the worst experience of their lives. One subtle difference between Xanax and Paxil is that one produces a mildly euphoric experience while the other simply restores a normal state of being. But Xanax is HIGHLY addictive!!! I can’t describe the sensation, but Xanax made me feel like I always had to take another dose. There was no pain or suffering, just a mental compulsion to take another dose. I was lucky that I only took it for 5-6 months, long-term users report absolute hell in withdrawal.
Response:
> But people have sued the manufacturers of Paxil and won because they > didn’t reveal the severity of withdrawal. There have been scores of > Paxil anecdotes here, some people have no problem while others say > it was the worst experience of their lives.
I’m one of the former, although I had such horrible side-effects when I was taking it that any withdrawal may have been compensated for by the diminished side-effects once I’d given it the boot. > One subtle difference between Xanax and Paxil is that one produces a > mildly euphoric experience while the other simply restores a normal > state of being. But Xanax is HIGHLY addictive!!! I can’t describe > the sensation, but Xanax made me feel like I always had to take > another dose. There was no pain or suffering, just a mental > compulsion to take another dose. I was lucky that I only took it > for 5-6 months, long-term users report absolute hell in withdrawal.
I’m curious about this one. I’d taken lorazepam for about 2 years, which is supposedly one of the most "addictive" benzos, and when I decided it wasn’t really useful so I may as well stop it I experienced 2 or 3 weeks of slightly increased anxiety, agitation and so on, but certainly a long way from "absolute hell." I’m wondering if I’m somehow more resistant to withdrawal than most others, or if it’s more a case of how much aggro someone’s prepared to tolerate? In my case I think I took the rather morbid line that life was already so crap that some extra horribleness was no big deal. Chris.
Response:
> >Correct me if I’m wrong, but I know that benzodiazepines work by suppressing >the CNS. So why are they addictive? And first of all, what is the definition >of addiction? Effexor and Paxil has terrible withdrawal symptoms; why are >they not considered addictive, for example?? >cem > They all are addictive.
Before proceeding on this, does anyone know why the ASAP people, of whom one at least has visited here, are vociferously against the position that benzos are addicting? And why, this group does not go bezerk if you mention benzo addiction? Squiggles
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Before proceeding on this, does anyone know >why the ASAP people, of whom one at least has >visited here, are vociferously against the position >that benzos are addicting? And why, this group >does not go bezerk if you mention benzo addiction? > Because unlike you, they just can’t admit addiction. It’s like walking > in a bar at 11 a.m. and telling people they are alcoholics. > It’s the flip side of anti-med —- pro-med. So blinded and in denial > they can’t see the forest for the trees. > Did you notice they now have a message board for people who want to > debate things that may be "disruptive", IOW – addiction? > Just go to ASAP and ask if benzos are addictive, and report back your > results.
I’ve been there – if you check the Google correspondence between Ian and me, you will see the acrimonious nature of the debate. It’s hard to believe that all of them are blinded to the possibility of addiction. Interesting that they now have a "disruptive" room – maybe I should go there, LOL! Squiggles
Response:
>Correct me if I’m wrong, but I know that benzodiazepines work by suppressing >the CNS. So why are they addictive? And first of all, what is the definition >of addiction? Effexor and Paxil has terrible withdrawal symptoms; why are >they not considered addictive, for example??
I can only say from personal experience that benzos are incredibly addictive. Especially Xanax. In a way they are similar to methamphetamine, neither makes you think you’re addicted. Like meth, benzos create a pure mental desire to take another dose, you always find some rationale to do more, thee is no actual physical withdrawal involved. Perhaps there is some withdrawal, it tends not to be painful, just a dramatic increase in anxiety, the very thing benzos are prescribed to treat.
Response:
>Correct me if I’m wrong, but I know that benzodiazepines work by suppressing >the CNS. So why are they addictive? And first of all, what is the definition >of addiction? Effexor and Paxil has terrible withdrawal symptoms; why are >they not considered addictive, for example?? > There are two kind, psychological and physical. Which do you mean?
both
Response:
> Not true, Chris. The benzodiazepine Klonopin (clonazepam HCl) has a > half-life of between 30-40 hours–a half life typical of the SSRIs (except > fluoxetine).
Okay, maybe I missed out the phrase "generally speaking." Of course there are exceptions with a minority of benzos with atypically long half-lives and antidepressants with very short ones, but IMHO using one of the exceptions to say the basis is "not true" is nitpicking (of course it may be inaccurate in other more valid aspects) Chris.
Response:
> > >Correct me if I’m wrong, but I know that benzodiazepines work by > suppressing > >the CNS. So why are they addictive? And first of all, what is the > definition > >of addiction? Effexor and Paxil has terrible withdrawal symptoms; why are > >they not considered addictive, for example?? > There are two kind, psychological and physical. Which do you mean? > both
I agree with all the above about benzos. However, antidepressants are not addictive. Basically, addictive psychiatric drugs (i.e. benzodiazepines) are all like alcohol and all the other well known addictive drugs. The exact reason they are addictive, on a molecular/biochemical level, is a mystery. Antidepressants aren’t. They seem to work by putting a floor under one’s mood state, so that you don’t go spiraling downwards. But you won’t see people on the street because of being hooked on antidepressants – it just doesn’t happen. The people who deny that benzos are addictive are either in an addictive denial state or in some other peculiar denial state. There’s no doubt that benzos are highly addictive.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > >Correct me if I’m wrong, but I know that benzodiazepines work by > suppressing > > >the CNS. So why are they addictive? And first of all, what is the > definition > > >of addiction? Effexor and Paxil has terrible withdrawal symptoms; why are > > >they not considered addictive, for example?? > > There are two kind, psychological and physical. Which do you mean? > both > I agree with all the above about benzos. However, antidepressants are > not addictive. > Basically, addictive psychiatric drugs (i.e. benzodiazepines) are all > like alcohol and all the other well known addictive drugs. The exact > reason they are addictive, on a molecular/biochemical level, is a > mystery. > Antidepressants aren’t. They seem to work by putting a floor under > one’s mood state, so that you don’t go spiraling downwards. But you > won’t see people on the street because of being hooked on > antidepressants – it just doesn’t happen. > The people who deny that benzos are addictive are either in an > addictive denial state or in some other peculiar denial state. > There’s no doubt that benzos are highly addictive.
I think the word "addiction" has a special pharmaceutical meaning and a literal one; it is the literal one that gets people or riled up. Regarding the ADs however, it seems that some of the new ones leave their mark, if you discontinue the drug; hence the neologism: "discontinuation syndrome" – how similar that is to "addiction" is something a competent pharmacologist should be able to figure out. Squiggles — Truth has become a commodity. - Squiggles
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > >Correct me if I’m wrong, but I know that benzodiazepines work by > suppressing > > >the CNS. So why are they addictive? And first of all, what is the > definition > > >of addiction? Effexor and Paxil has terrible withdrawal symptoms; why are > > >they not considered addictive, for example?? > > There are two kind, psychological and physical. Which do you mean? > both > I agree with all the above about benzos. However, antidepressants are > not addictive. > Basically, addictive psychiatric drugs (i.e. benzodiazepines) are all > like alcohol and all the other well known addictive drugs. The exact > reason they are addictive, on a molecular/biochemical level, is a > mystery.
OK. I drop my request for a molecular/biological level description of addiction. All I ask is, why do you call alcohol and benzos addictive, and the AD’s not addictive! What is the behavioural difference between the addicts to benzos and patients strugling to withdraw Effexor? cem
Response:
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I know that benzodiazepines work by suppressing the CNS. So why are they addictive? And first of all, what is the definition of addiction? Effexor and Paxil has terrible withdrawal symptoms; why are they not considered addictive, for example?? cem
Response:
> Correct me if I’m wrong, but I know that benzodiazepines work by suppressing > the CNS. So why are they addictive? And first of all, what is the definition > of addiction?
Because the CNS adapts to compensate after prolonged suppression, so once the suppression ends the CNS becomes overactive resulting in various nasties like anxiety and insomnia. Or something like that. > Effexor and Paxil has terrible withdrawal symptoms; why are > they not considered addictive, for example??
Much longer half-life. Benzos wear off after a few hours leading to the chronic user to be continuously aware that they need to take another dose. Most ADs take several days (at least) before any withdrawal effects are likely to appear, which doesn’t have quite the same immediacy about it. Chris.
Response:
>Correct me if I’m wrong, but I know that benzodiazepines work by suppressing >the CNS. So why are they addictive? And first of all, what is the definition >of addiction? Effexor and Paxil has terrible withdrawal symptoms; why are >they not considered addictive, for example?? >cem
They all are addictive.
Response:
Not true, Chris. The benzodiazepine Klonopin (clonazepam HCl) has a half-life of between 30-40 hours–a half life typical of the SSRIs (except fluoxetine).
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Correct me if I’m wrong, but I know that benzodiazepines work by suppressing > the CNS. So why are they addictive? And first of all, what is the definition > of addiction? > Because the CNS adapts to compensate after prolonged suppression, so > once the suppression ends the CNS becomes overactive resulting in > various nasties like anxiety and insomnia. Or something like that. > Effexor and Paxil has terrible withdrawal symptoms; why are > they not considered addictive, for example?? > Much longer half-life. Benzos wear off after a few hours leading to > the chronic user to be continuously aware that they need to take > another dose. Most ADs take several days (at least) before any > withdrawal effects are likely to appear, which doesn’t have quite > the same immediacy about it. > Chris.
Response: