Question:

>All this "science", and one still has to play hit or >miss with meds. Welcome to the real world. >Science is an attempt to understand and >control >the world, and the mind; looking for the inner >thetan or counting chicken bones, has not >been >competitive. >Squiggles

"The purpose of "Science" is to devolop without prejudice or preconception of any kind a knowledge of the facts, the laws and the processes of nature. The laws of nature are the rules of existence, actions and relations, where God has endowed animate and inanimate matter by giving it various properties, as essential to its varing constitution and as regulating its existence, actions and relations. It is erroneous in this imperfect earth and universe to speak of fixed and eternally unchngeable laws of nature." Paul S. L. Johnson (1938)

Response:

> >You allow yourself to fear death! > What’s wrong with embracing death?

– We are not so powerful as to embrace death; sometimes it embraces us. Squiggles

Response:

> >> Is the mind even meant to be "controlled"? >Absolutely – unless you like running around like >a raving lunatic, and slaughtering millions of >innocent people, like some great charismatic leaders >have done – I think you can name them. > Actually, people with their mind controlled do slaughter innocent > people. See religion.

If you mean "drugged" by controlled, which is what you originally used the word for in the previous message, undrugged insanity is more dangerous than drugged insanity. Squiggles

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > wrote the following: >>> Is the mind even meant to be "controlled"? >>Absolutely – unless you like running around like >>a raving lunatic, and slaughtering millions of >>innocent people, like some great charismatic leaders >>have done – I think you can name them. > Actually, people with their mind controlled do slaughter innocent > people. See religion. > This mailbomber guy had some issues: > Text of note left with bombs in Illinois, Iowa > Following is the letter attached to pipe bombs left in mailboxes in > Iowa and Illinois. Spelling and punctuation errors are preserved from > the original: > Mailboxes are exploding! Why, you ask? > Attention people. > You do things because you can and want (desire) to > If the government controls what you want to do, they control what you > can do. > If you are under the impression that death exists, and you fear it, you > do anything to avoid it. (This is the same way pain operates. Naturally > we strive to avoid negative emotion/pain.) > You allow yourself to fear death! > World authorities allowed, and still allow you to fear death! > In avoiding death you are forced to conform, if you fail to conform, > you suffer mentally and physically. (Are world powers utilizing the > natural survival instinct in a way that allows them to capitalize on > the people?) > To ?live? (avoid death) in this society you are forced to conform/slave > away. > I?m here to help you realize/ understand that you will live no matter > what! It is up to you people to open your hearts and minds. There is no > such thing as death. The people I?ve dismissed from this reality are > not at all dead. > Conforming to the boundaries, and restrictions imposed by the > government only reduces the substance in your lives. When 1% of the > nation controls 99% of the nations total wealth, is it a wonder why > there are control problems? > The United States strives to provide freedom for their people. Do we > really have personal freedom? I?ve lived here for many years, and I see > much limitation. Does the definition of freedom include limitation? > I?ve learned about the history of various civilizations in history, and > I see more and more limitation. Do you people enjoy this trend of > limitation? If not, change it! > As long as you are uninformed about death you will continue to say ?how > high?, when the government tells you to ?jump?. As long as the > government is uninformed about death they will continue tell you to > ?jump? Is the government uninformed about death, or are they > pretending? > You have been missing how things are, for very long. I?m obtaining your > attention in the only way I can. More info is on its way. More > ?attention getters? are on the way. If I could, I would change only one > person, unfortunately the resources are not accessible. It seems > killing a single famous person would get the same media attention as > killing numerous un-famous humans. There is less risk of being > detained, associated with dismissing certain people. > Sincerely, > Someone Who Cares > PS. More info. will be delivered to various locations around the > country. > — >