Question:
Would anybody care to comment on this and its effect on new visitors and sensitive regulars? Or is it acceptable and not worth commenting on because it refers to Andrew? Andrew has been LYING ALL THE TIME!!!! He is actually ON both Prozac, Elavil, as WELL as Xanax!! He has BOTH major OCD, as well as psychosis, but DOESN’T take his Haldol, and his anxiety and psychosis is triggered by the A.D.’s!! I have also had hot homosexual encounters with him, as he has *pleaded* to me for hot anal sex. He enjoy’s taking up the *back door*, but I am going to dump *the bitch*, because he is getting WAYYY too ugly, and sick as well. He USED to be able to pay me for the hot anal sex, but has been cumming up with excuses. The guy has a poop-shoot WIDER then the Grand Canyon!! You can read his personal ad in alt.anal.homosexual.ssri. This jerk even makes the GAY community ashamed that he is one of us who bends for a friend. He didn’t notice the BIG ozzing gential wart I had last time I cornholed him, so maybe his herpes will calm him DOWN. He has ALSO had sex with MANY male church leaders in his community. I just wanted to warn anybody who Andy offers to have sex for money with, that he has NOOOO money, and is a lying bastard. Lot’s of love and sweet kisses…Timmy – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->I have had a rough few months plagued with anxiety attacks, visited my >doctor and was prescribed Celexa (Citalopram). >Unfortunately however it has rendered me totally impotent, unable to achieve >an erection or orgasm. This effect is absolute and astonishing – I haven’t >come in a month, which is amazing to me since I used to come every day. At >first this didn’t really bother me, but as time has gone on it is more and >more frustrating, I hadn’t realised how important sexual function is to me >and now I have discontinued the medication. >I had a similar experience two years ago with Paroxetine (Paxil) – the >impotence was not quite as complete but in addition was very uncomfortable, >I felt as if my genitals had somehow been rewired in an unpleasant way. > Thank you for a good hand-job. > All faggots like me, and my AIDS-infected "partner"…
Response:
Yes bob, this is one of the occasional posts which are vulgar, distractive, and problematic. It is an example of the "backlash" to the abuse which has driven people to vent their extreme anger and frustration which andy creates. Now, most all normal people feel this way and try to forget we read it. It would have served you better to not repost this vulgarity. An old saying, " This is like a bucket of shit, the more you stir it, the worse it stinks". Better to walk away from it quickly. Another concept, this one from the legal arena bob, it is, "If not but for…." This applies to establish causality for a libelous action. Well, it applies to ASDM as well. "If not but for the presence of the psychopath Andrew Chmilewsky, then we wouldn’t be having the "backlash effect" or this conversation." FACT, PERIOD! So what’s your point? You just opened yourself up for me to defeat the point you so annoyingly wanted to make, that being, that others are equally as disgusting as Andrew! Well, when andy isn’t here, then we don’t have these vulgar "comeback" posts. You have just allowed me to reinforce our position, and weaken yours. You also posted with a misleading subject line, that being, abuse in asdm, which insults the efforts of those of us who spend countless hours trying to make this a sanctuary. It is your myopic perspective that makes it clear what your agenda is, which is, to help perpetuate the criminal behavior of andrew chmilewsky. The net result of your presence here thus far, has been to exacerbate the pain and confusion caused by the "a" troll. And you wonder why people think you’re a troll. Geees! (shaking head) Mark of the Forest
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Would anybody care to comment on this and its effect on new visitors and > sensitive regulars?
Response:
<Would anybody care to comment on this and its effect on new visitors and <sensitive regulars? <Or is it acceptable and not worth commenting on because it refers to Andrew? It is not acceptable, and the best way to deal with it is to ignore it, just as we tried to ignore Andy’s posts. The difference is that whoever posted this will stop when no attention is given to it, while Andy continues or escalate vulgar posts when ignored. So we are using the same methods to get rid of this as we have with Andy’s posts, it just didn’t work with Andy. (I call him that because it bugs him) You see Bob, I have copies of almost a thousand posts like this that Andy has produced of the last nine months. Within that period, I can show you where we all got together and "shunned" him, completely ignoring him, as if he did not exist, like the mormons do with members that do bad things. We kept this up for weeks and all it did was to infuriate Andy and make him double his abuse. So to answer your question, there is no difference between this abusive post and Andy’s abusive posts, the only difference is who is behind it and how they respond. Hopper
Response:
Oh bull pucky you people never got your act together and ignored him completely. you learn how to fix your little andrew problem before you start spewing your advice.. It was those darn rumour weeds!! Ralph V
Comments